Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Trevor Paglen's "Seeing Machines" and Ed Lake's "The Machine Gaze" - Response

Not sure what to say when it comes to photography and the technology - cameras - used to make it possible. Saying that cameras/photography are becoming a minor contributor is a bit of a stretch to me since they still play a part to creating art, documenting events, and other sorts. Although, on a side note, seeing that Bridle's New Aesthetic brought a better viewpoint on (or it changed) the visual culture, like it brought in the use of pixelation in photography and artwork.

I cannot name specific pictures, but I have seen some pictures where I couldn't identify the author of them. In my case, I can sometimes determine who made the pictures based on the style of the them, from the kind of angle/perspective they are in, the colors utilized in the pictures, the positioning of the subjects in the frame, and so on; however, one would alter their style, which would deviate from what I would be used to. There are other cases when an author can have a similar style like another author, which makes it confusing to know which author made a specific picture.

As for a perspective for a picture in terms of representation (if I understand the question on this correctly), the only thing I can say for that is on how it can give a better "light" for a subject in hand (or frame, to be more exact).

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Miwon Kwon's "One Place After Another" - Response

From what I can understand from Miwon Kwon's "One Place After Another", it states (in context) on how identity and site can merge to become a "place"; with identity being the representation of a town, city, or park and the community within it, as in what the "place" really is. Art pieces/sculptures are one of the few things that play the part of providing an identity for a site, and some artists like John Ahearn help contribute with making them for that purpose. Speaking of Ahearn, what he did for the South Bronx of New York was that he made sculptures to give the place a "better look" - to embody the “South Bronx attitude”; although, after many years after the sculptures were displayed in the public streets, they were taken down due to some criticism of artworks not representing the town/community that well (or at all).

Of a personal experience, I can remember when I was in my Junior High school years where there were plenty of students there that were, I would say, iffy - like jerks and bullies, though there were not many. It was like that for a while all the way up to my Freshman year at the Mahomet-Seymour High School, but that changed on the start of my Sophomore year when the high school began to be more strict on bullying to keep the school "clean"; so I rarely see (or hear about) bullying ever since then.

The closest thing I had of a defense for a site is when my parents used to rearrange furniture in my home every two years to change the look of some rooms, which normally annoyed me since I tend to get used to a certain position for furniture. There was one time when my mother wanted to rearrange my bedroom, but I suggested that I want to keep my room as it is since I already liked how my room looks.